A.I.L.F.

Powered by homoTiller Media Industries.

    Sunday, July 25, 2010

    "Female Friendly" v. Same Old "Spank Vids" NSFW Links for those not on funemployment

    I was searching porn for "Molly Morrison", since this is the pseudonym of "internet celebrity" Amor Hilton. [Not a particularly scortching scene, but different. Does she seem possibly drugged to you too?] I  occasionally check up on internet porn, because, you know... I want to know what's going on, I want to know what's out there...I'm a well rounded person...and boy was I surprised to find "Female Friendly" on a well travelled porn site. "Alright! Let's see what is friendly to females these days." Lemme tell you, it's nothing to copy, paste & click home about. I noted a clip called "Spoiled Brats Tan and Smoke".  "So Hot!! I'm damp in the basement for that, for sure."  I was offended that the content was considered friendly to females. It is exactly the same thing, ordered and distributed the same way as always.  I'm not surprised the same things that generally appeal to women, generally appeal to men, so in that regard, I don't understand why a new category was even created.  I have definitely seen "she-centric" porn and surely support the concept, but that wasn't what this category contained. From a marketing perspective, it's a fail because any woman seeking something friendly need only take a quick glance to see that the material is not different, nor friendly as evidenced by the ad clip of a woman being "forced" at the bottom of the page.  Again, I'm not judging the content or those who like it, just that it's questionably labeled. I cannot imagine that there's someone actively looking at the material and saying "This would turn a woman on."  In fact, I think it's a miniscule fraction of the adult industry that does ask this question. I applaud Howard Stern's recent Penthouse Pet interview where the gals admit porn is acting.  I didn't need the Pets to tell me that most ladies can be remarkably talented actresses when the situation dictates, and not just the pron ones, but it's always nice to have 3rd party verification of my beliefs. 

    Aside:  Do you love that picture?  I do. It's endlessly funny to me.  Even more funny that you're supposed to pay to use the image.

    Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

    Bookmark and Share
    posted by spiderhole consumer @ 1:55 PM 

    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    << Home